On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Carter, Joel <JoelC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Jeff. > > Yes I think you are right that it's race condition between the Kerberos > ticket being stored and the automounter attempting to use that ticket. > > Thanks for the reminder of sec=krb5 maturity status, I wasn't aware of > that. This is for a production system so I should probably stay away > from it. That said, do you know if this is possible with RHEL5 using > smbfs (sorry - off topic) or should I push this off until we move to > RHEL6? It's not a must have, just trying to make our AD/RHEL integration > as tight as possible. I found your bugzilla entry as well, I'll keep my > eyes on it. smbfs doesn't support krb5. I did get the impression that Jeff did a good job of the Kerberos backport for RHEL5 though. -- Thanks, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
