On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 02:38:37PM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote: > > Sorry, but if a WAN accelerator does not have the smarts to > > see that if a client sends smbechos, it is in trouble, then > > that WAN accelerator is just broken. It does not necessarily > > need to send these echos across the WAN link, but it must > > trigger its own server liveliness check at this point. > > I agree. > > That's why these companies hire me, though. They have *no clue* when it > comes to CIFS and they run into brick walls at full speed. > > When it comes down to it, though, anyone with smarts and half a clue would > avoid SMB/CIFS if at all possible. Most of what we do with Samba and the > CIFS client is mitigate stupidity. :) AFS to the rescue! (Sorry, wrong list I think... :-) Volker -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
