Re: [PATCH 2/5] CIFS: Invalidate inode pages on the last close

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff's point looks correct.  Also note when you fix this up - the
local variable for cifs_sb from the previous patch (which caused a
build warning for unused variable) needs to be readded back to this
patch.

On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 12:01:17 +0300
> Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On strict cache mode when we close the last file handle of the inode we
>> should invalidate this inode to prevent data coherency problem when we
>> open it again but it has been modified by other clients.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  fs/cifs/cifs_fs_sb.h |    1 +
>>  fs/cifs/file.c       |    3 +++
>>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifs_fs_sb.h b/fs/cifs/cifs_fs_sb.h
>> index 525ba59..3690c50 100644
>> --- a/fs/cifs/cifs_fs_sb.h
>> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifs_fs_sb.h
>> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
>>  #define CIFS_MOUNT_FSCACHE   0x8000 /* local caching enabled */
>>  #define CIFS_MOUNT_MF_SYMLINKS       0x10000 /* Minshall+French Symlinks enabled */
>>  #define CIFS_MOUNT_MULTIUSER 0x20000 /* multiuser mount */
>> +#define CIFS_MOUNT_STRICT_IO 0x40000 /* strict cache mode */
>>
>>  struct cifs_sb_info {
>>       struct radix_tree_root tlink_tree;
>> diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
>> index a566f15..3970e68 100644
>> --- a/fs/cifs/file.c
>> +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
>> @@ -284,6 +284,9 @@ void cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
>>       }
>>       spin_unlock(&cifs_file_list_lock);
>>
>> +     if (cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags & CIFS_MOUNT_STRICT_IO)
>> +             invalidate_remote_inode(inode);
>> +
>>       if (!tcon->need_reconnect && !cifs_file->invalidHandle) {
>>               int xid, rc;
>>
>
> Suppose I have this file open twice and have r/o oplocks on both
> filehandles. I close one of those file descriptors and the cache is
> invalidated. Is that really what we want here?
>
> --
> Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>



-- 
Thanks,

Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux