> Ok. I think the locking around the sequence number could stand some > improvement. It seems a bit complex -- maybe a simple atomic counter > would be more appropriate? In any case, it's probably better to leave > that for a later patch. > > You can add my reviewed-by on this one. I don't see any obvious > problems now. > > -- > Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxx> > Jeff, Thanks. I see three issues that need to be addressed once these NTLM patches are through. 1. purging code obsolet'ed by kernel crypto apis. 2. revisiting logic in cifs_reconnect() 3. data type and/or locking around sequence_number -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
