On Thu, 7 Oct 2010 22:25:23 -0500 Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > One case does seem strange - I forgot what happens when you specify a > mnt_uid of 0 (root) > Oof, you're right... we should base this on CIFS_MOUNT_OVERR_UID and CIFS_MOUNT_OVERR_GID flags instead. I'll send a fixed patch once I've tested it. Now that I think about this though, maybe we shouldn't do this based on CIFS_MOUNT_MULTIUSER but instead on CIFS_MOUNT_NO_PERM? It would mean a behavior change for anyone currently "-o noperm" on a mount without unix extensions but I think it would make a bit more sense than special casing CIFS_MOUNT_MULTIUSER here. Thoughts? -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
