Re: CIFS data coherency problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2010/9/13 Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > If the server doesn't pay attention to that field, then Pavel is
> correct and this is a server bug.
>
> Is it legitimate for the client to send an "oplock break" on its own
> without the server requesting it first? If so, is the oplock level

I didn't find a place in spec related to this. And also I didn't see
anything similar in the captures with Windows client.

> field also ignored? How does the server match up an oplock break
> "request" to the "response"?
>
> It might be good to ask this on samba-technical (and maybe to ask MS).

-- 
Best regards,
Pavel Shilovsky.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux