On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The VFS always checks that the source and target of a rename are on the > same vfsmount, and hence have the same superblock. So, this check is > redundant. Remove it and simplify the error handling. I looked more closely at this, and although EXDEV is checked for in one place (early in the rename syscall), there are other paths to iop->cifs_rename (nfs server and cachefiles for example call vfs_rename directly) which do not check this, so it looks like the cifs EXDEV check is not redundant and should be kept. -- Thanks, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
