On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 17:53 +0100, David Howells wrote: > utz lehmann <lkml123@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > When abusing an existing time stamp use atime not ctime please. > > ctime has it's uses. atime was just a mistake and is nearly useless. > > CacheFiles currently uses atime to determine least-recently-usedness. How does this works right with noatime or relatime (which is default)? We had used FS-Cache with a few 10000s files cached. Doesn't it mean that the cleanup has to stat them all? Why didn't cachefilesd managed the cache index in a separate database like other caches? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
