Mark Harris <mhlk@xxxxxx> wrote: > At least for the in-tree filesystems, I do not see any that keep > timestamps with a granularity larger than 2s. For that, a simple > 32-bit tv_granularity in nanoseconds (not limited to 1e9) would > suffice, and there is no need for the complexity of dealing with > a separate exponent. That's a good point. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
