On 16.03.2025 13:39:16, Oliver Hartkopp wrote: > > > On 14.03.25 13:31, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > > On 14.03.2025 12:39:49, Davide Caratti wrote: > > > The third column in the output of the following command: > > > > > > # grep CAN /proc/net/protocols > > > > > > is systematically '0': use sock_prot_inuse_add() to account for the number > > > of sockets for each protocol on top of AF_CAN family. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Applied to linux-can-next. > > > > Maybe too fast? E.g. J1939 is not handled. > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/78951192-82b1-45bc-9903-d314c94cd182@xxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#m87afc41fef8ec9099344c753e32b06f302cc0e39 Can IMHO be added in a later patch. regards, Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de | Vertretung Nürnberg | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9 |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
