Am Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 04:38:48PM +0000 schrieb Conor Dooley: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 02:12:33PM +0100, Dimitri Fedrau via B4 Relay wrote: > > From: Dimitri Fedrau <dimitri.fedrau@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Currently the flexcan driver does not support adding PHYs. Add the > > capability to ensure that the PHY is in operational state when the link > > is set to an "up" state. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dimitri Fedrau <dimitri.fedrau@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/fsl,flexcan.yaml | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/fsl,flexcan.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/fsl,flexcan.yaml > > index 97dd1a7c5ed26bb7f1b2f78c326d91e2c299938a..397957569588a61111a313cf9107e29dacc9e667 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/fsl,flexcan.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/fsl,flexcan.yaml > > @@ -70,6 +70,9 @@ properties: > > xceiver-supply: > > description: Regulator that powers the CAN transceiver. > > > > + phys: > > + maxItems: 1 > > Can all devices in this binding support external phy? Are all devices > limited to a single external phy? > As far as I know, these devices are controllers without integrated PHY. So they need a single external PHY. Transceivers can be very simple like xceiver-supply in the binding, but I want to use "ti,tcan1043" in drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver. Best regards, Dimitri Fedrau [...]
