On 1/13/2025 3:46 PM, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 14:07:02 +0200, Ciprian Costea wrote:
From: Ciprian Marian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Add S32G2/S32G3 SoCs compatible strings.
A particularity for these SoCs is the presence of separate interrupts for
state change, bus errors, MBs 0-7 and MBs 8-127 respectively.
Increase maxItems of 'interrupts' to 4 for S32G based SoCs and keep the
same restriction for other SoCs.
Also, as part of this commit, move the 'allOf' after the required
properties to make the documentation easier to read.
Signed-off-by: Ciprian Marian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../bindings/net/can/fsl,flexcan.yaml | 44 +++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
Missing tags:
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hello Rob,
I just wanted to add the RESEND word to these patch series because no
update was made with respect to its acceptance. Following [1] kernel
documentation for submitting patches I was not sure if by adding the
received 'Acked-by' to a commit it will still be correct to add the
RESEND word or I should send a new patch version on this series.
On short, my lack of addition for the 'Acked-by' was not on purpose.
[1] https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html
Best Regards,
Ciprian
