On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 04:18:59PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 05:10:31PM +0100, Sean Nyekjaer wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 04:56:13PM +0100, Sean Nyekjaer wrote: > > > Hi Conor, > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 03:50:30PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 02:40:47PM +0100, Sean Nyekjaer wrote: > > > > > tcan4x5x requires an external clock called cclk, add it here. > > > > > > > > That's not what this patch is doing, the clock input is already there, > > > > so I don't know what this patch actually accomplishes? clock-names isn't > > > > a required property, so you can't even use it in a driver. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for asking the right questions :) > > > > > > I know the clock input is there, but it looks (to me) like the driver looks for the > > > specific clock called cclk: > > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12/source/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c#L2299 > > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12/source/drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x-core.c#L396 > > > > Oh I really need to get my head around the dt jargon :) > > Yes I'll add the clock-names to the required list for v2! > > btw, where even is ti,tcan4x5x.yaml? I was gonna paste the fixes tag you > should be using but I couldn't find the file in linux-next. It's here: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkl/linux-can-next.git/commit/?h=testing&id=77400284f54b9a1f6b6127c08cb935fc05e5c3d2 Do you think the fixes tag is needed? Fixes: 77400284f54b ("dt-bindings: can: convert tcan4x5x.txt to DT schema") /Sean
