* Oliver Hartkopp (socketcan@xxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> Hi David,
Hi Oliver,
> On 13.09.24 16:03, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>
> > I'm doing some deadcode hunting and noticed that
> >
> > alloc_canxl_skb in drivers/net/can/dev/skb.c
> >
> > looks unused in the main kernel tree; is that expected?
> > I see it was added back in 2022 by
> > fb08cba12b52 ("can: canxl: update CAN infrastructure for CAN XL frames")
> >
> > I know almost exactly nothing about CAN, so I thought it best
> > to ask!
>
> I created some slides so that you can get an introduction to the different
> CAN protocols CAN CC (aka Classical CAN), CAN FD and CAN XL:
>
> https://github.com/linux-can/can-doc/tree/master/presentations
Thanks!
> The introduction of the CAN XL support lead to some clean up and rework also
> for the former alloc_can_skb() and alloc_canfd_skb() helpers.
>
> The function is currently not in use in net/can/raw.c as it is only needed
> when a CAN XL frame is received from read hardware. But the patch also
> contains the definition of ETH_P_CANXL to already handle CAN XL frames
> properly inside the Linux kernel and e.g. for WireShark 4.4.
>
> There are currently some CAN XL IP cores in development (see attached
> picture with an FPGA based IP core) and I am working on the kernel
> infrastructure (e.g. bitrate configuration enhancements) on this board. So
> alloc_canxl_skb() is already in use on my desk and there will be some more
> stuff showing up soon ;-)
OK, great - I won't try and deadcode it then!
Thanks again for the reply,
Dave
> Best regards,
> Oliver
--
-----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux | Happy \
\ dave @ treblig.org | | In Hex /
\ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/
