On 02.09.2024 10:29:38, Alibek Omarov wrote: > > Are you using the CAN in production devices? The driver runs quite good > > on a v3 chip, but still not stable on the v2. But as our customer now > > only uses v3, I don't have any more time left to fix v2 issues. Drop me > > a note, if you have issues with the v2 chip. > > Oh, I meant v2 patch set. Ok I see :) The difference between the patch series v2 and v3 was change in the compatibles and DT bindings. I've added your Tested-by to the upcoming v4, I thinks this is still OK, right? > We're probably mostly running on v3 chips, since nobody so far > complained about CAN bus and you're also telling it more stable there. > :) With the v3 SoC the CAN runs more stable than with the v2 SoC, but still not 1000%. My basic idea was to get it mainline and thus a larger usage and test coverage. Nevertheless, I am very interested in any usage or test cases that break the driver. regards, Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de | Vertretung Nürnberg | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9 |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
