On 09.08.2024 13:22:49, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote: > From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 11:57:41 +0200 > > Hello David, > > > > many thanks for the patch and the description. > > > > Btw. the data structures of the elements inside that bcm proc dir should > > have been removed at that point, so that the can-bcm dir should be empty. > > > > I'm not sure what happens to the open sockets that are (later) removed > > in bcm_release() when we use remove_proc_subtree() as suggested. > > Removing this warning probably does not heal the root cause of the issue. > > I posted a patch to fix bcm's proc entry leak few weeks ago, and this might > be related. > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240722192842.37421-1-kuniyu@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > Oliver, could you take this patch to can tree ? That patch is included in my latest PR to net: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240829192947.1186760-1-mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de | Vertretung Nürnberg | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9 |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
