Re: [PATCH 01/17] dt-bindings: can: mpfs: add PIC64GX CAN compatibility

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 25.07.2024 13:15:53, pierre-henry.moussay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Pierre-Henry Moussay <pierre-henry.moussay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> PIC64GX CAN is compatible with the MPFS CAN driver, so we just update
> bindings

As Conor already pointed out, you should point out that the CAN
hardware/IP core on the pic64gx is compatible with the one on the mpfs.

regards,
Marc

> 
> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Henry Moussay <pierre-henry.moussay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mpfs-can.yaml     | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mpfs-can.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mpfs-can.yaml
> index 01e4d4a54df6..1219c5cb601f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mpfs-can.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mpfs-can.yaml
> @@ -15,7 +15,11 @@ allOf:
>  
>  properties:
>    compatible:
> -    const: microchip,mpfs-can
> +    oneOf:
> +      - items:
> +          - const: microchip,pic64gx-can
> +          - const: microchip,mpfs-can
> +      - const: microchip,mpfs-can
>  
>    reg:
>      maxItems: 1
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux