On 6/29/24 11:55, Vincent MAILHOL wrote:
On Sat. 29 June 2024 at 04:56, Jimmy Assarsson <extja@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:For usbcan devices (M16C), add struct usbcan_cmd_tx_acknowledge for Tx ACK commands and struct usbcan_cmd_clk_overflow_event for clock overflow event commands. Signed-off-by: Jimmy Assarsson <extja@xxxxxxxxxx> --- .../net/can/usb/kvaser_usb/kvaser_usb_leaf.c | 22 +++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/can/usb/kvaser_usb/kvaser_usb_leaf.c b/drivers/net/can/usb/kvaser_usb/kvaser_usb_leaf.c index c0a8713d8cf2..98bd6cfca2ca 100644 --- a/drivers/net/can/usb/kvaser_usb/kvaser_usb_leaf.c +++ b/drivers/net/can/usb/kvaser_usb/kvaser_usb_leaf.c @@ -242,6 +242,13 @@ struct leaf_cmd_tx_acknowledge { u8 padding[2]; } __packed; +struct usbcan_cmd_tx_acknowledge { + u8 channel; + u8 tid; + __le16 time; + u8 padding[2]; +} __packed; + struct leaf_cmd_can_error_event { u8 tid; u8 flags; @@ -288,6 +295,12 @@ struct usbcan_cmd_error_event { __le16 padding; } __packed; +struct usbcan_cmd_clk_overflow_event { + u8 tid; + u8 padding; + __le32 time; +} __packed; + struct kvaser_cmd_ctrl_mode { u8 tid; u8 channel; @@ -363,6 +376,8 @@ struct kvaser_cmd { struct usbcan_cmd_chip_state_event chip_state_event; struct usbcan_cmd_can_error_event can_error_event; struct usbcan_cmd_error_event error_event; + struct usbcan_cmd_tx_acknowledge tx_ack; + struct usbcan_cmd_clk_overflow_event clk_overflow_event; } __packed usbcan; struct kvaser_cmd_tx_can tx_can; @@ -396,15 +411,14 @@ static const u8 kvaser_usb_leaf_cmd_sizes_usbcan[] = { [CMD_START_CHIP_REPLY] = kvaser_fsize(u.simple), [CMD_STOP_CHIP_REPLY] = kvaser_fsize(u.simple), [CMD_GET_CARD_INFO_REPLY] = kvaser_fsize(u.cardinfo), - [CMD_TX_ACKNOWLEDGE] = kvaser_fsize(u.tx_acknowledge_header), + [CMD_TX_ACKNOWLEDGE] = kvaser_fsize(u.usbcan.tx_ack), [CMD_GET_SOFTWARE_INFO_REPLY] = kvaser_fsize(u.usbcan.softinfo), [CMD_RX_STD_MESSAGE] = kvaser_fsize(u.usbcan.rx_can), [CMD_RX_EXT_MESSAGE] = kvaser_fsize(u.usbcan.rx_can), [CMD_CHIP_STATE_EVENT] = kvaser_fsize(u.usbcan.chip_state_event), [CMD_CAN_ERROR_EVENT] = kvaser_fsize(u.usbcan.can_error_event), [CMD_ERROR_EVENT] = kvaser_fsize(u.usbcan.error_event), - /* ignored events: */ - [CMD_USBCAN_CLOCK_OVERFLOW_EVENT] = CMD_SIZE_ANY, + [CMD_USBCAN_CLOCK_OVERFLOW_EVENT] = kvaser_fsize(u.usbcan.clk_overflow_event), }; /* Summary of a kvaser error event, for a unified Leaf/Usbcan error @@ -1608,12 +1622,12 @@ static void kvaser_usb_leaf_handle_command(const struct kvaser_usb *dev, kvaser_usb_leaf_get_busparams_reply(dev, cmd); break; - /* Ignored commands */ case CMD_USBCAN_CLOCK_OVERFLOW_EVENT: if (dev->driver_info->family != KVASER_USBCAN) goto warn; break;I did not understand this part. If the overflow event is now handled, why do you still have the goto warn ?
The warning is for non-usbcan device (leaf), where this command is unexpected.
Shouldn't you dispatch the command here?
It's dispatched in the succeeding patch can: kvaser_usb: leaf: Store MSB of timestamp [1] I'll fix this in v2. I keep the "ignored events/commands" comments in this patch, and move them to the proper patch. Regards, /jimmy [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/20240701154936.92633-12-extja@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#u
+ /* Ignored commands */ case CMD_FLUSH_QUEUE_REPLY: if (dev->driver_info->family != KVASER_LEAF) goto warn; -- 2.45.2
