Re: [PATCH v4 04/11] tty: serdev: Add method to enable break flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 12 May 2024, Christoph Fritz wrote:

> On Fri, 2024-05-10 at 17:21 +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 May 2024, Christoph Fritz wrote:
> ...
> > > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serdev/core.c b/drivers/tty/serdev/core.c
> > > index 613cb356b918d..23a1e76cb553b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/tty/serdev/core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/tty/serdev/core.c
> > > @@ -339,6 +339,17 @@ unsigned int serdev_device_set_baudrate(struct serdev_device *serdev, unsigned i
> > >  }
> > >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(serdev_device_set_baudrate);
> > >  
> > > +void serdev_device_set_break_detection(struct serdev_device *serdev, bool enable)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct serdev_controller *ctrl = serdev->ctrl;
> > > +
> > > +	if (!ctrl || !ctrl->ops->set_break_detection)
> > > +		return;
> > 
> > Why you need to test for !ctrl?
> 
> In our case we don't, it's an extra check like all the other functions
> here:
> 
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.9-rc7/source/drivers/tty/serdev/core.c#L330

Okay. It might be I just don't understand all the structs in serdev well 
enough to understand when ctrl actually end ups being NULL so I don't 
object leaving it as is.

-- 
 i.

[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux