On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 09:37:46PM +0100, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 2024-02-19 18:00, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 08:47:43PM +0100, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> > > Hi Simon,
> > >
> > > I have a general question on the "Fixes:" tag in this patch:
> > >
> > > On 16.02.24 18:27, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 07:05:35AM -0800, Daniil Dulov wrote:
> > > > > In this case dev cannot be NULL, so remove redundant check.
> > > > >
> > > > > Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: 03fd3cf5a179 ("can: add driver for Softing card")
> > >
> > > IMHO this is simply an improvement which is done by all patches applied to
> > > the kernel but it does not really "fix" anything from a functional
> > > standpoint.
> > >
> > > Shouldn't we either invent a new tag or better leave it out to not confuse
> > > the stable maintainers?
> >
> > Hi Oliver,
> >
> > sorry for missing that in my review.
> >
> > Yes, I agree that this is probably not a fix, for which my
> > rule of thumb is something that addresses a user-visible problem.
> > So I agree it should not have a fixes tag.
> >
> > I would suggest that we can just change the text to something that
> > has no tag. Something like:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Introduced by 03fd3cf5a179 ("can: add driver for Softing card")
> >
>
> Yes, but the "Introduced-by:" tag would be an optional tag for people that
> like blaming others, right?
Yes, That does seem useful to me.
> IMHO we should think about completely removing the "Fixes:" tag, when it has
> no user-visible effect that might be a candidate for stable kernels. It is
> common improvement work. And it has been so for years.
Likewise, that does sound like a good idea to me.
