From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Lock jsk->sk to prevent UAF when setsockopt(..., SO_J1939_FILTER, ...)
modifies jsk->filters while receiving packets.
Following trace was seen on affected system:
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in j1939_sk_recv_match_one+0x1af/0x2d0 [can_j1939]
Read of size 4 at addr ffff888012144014 by task j1939/350
CPU: 0 PID: 350 Comm: j1939 Tainted: G W OE 6.5.0-rc5 #1
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
print_report+0xd3/0x620
? kasan_complete_mode_report_info+0x7d/0x200
? j1939_sk_recv_match_one+0x1af/0x2d0 [can_j1939]
kasan_report+0xc2/0x100
? j1939_sk_recv_match_one+0x1af/0x2d0 [can_j1939]
__asan_load4+0x84/0xb0
j1939_sk_recv_match_one+0x1af/0x2d0 [can_j1939]
j1939_sk_recv+0x20b/0x320 [can_j1939]
? __kasan_check_write+0x18/0x20
? __pfx_j1939_sk_recv+0x10/0x10 [can_j1939]
? j1939_simple_recv+0x69/0x280 [can_j1939]
? j1939_ac_recv+0x5e/0x310 [can_j1939]
j1939_can_recv+0x43f/0x580 [can_j1939]
? __pfx_j1939_can_recv+0x10/0x10 [can_j1939]
? raw_rcv+0x42/0x3c0 [can_raw]
? __pfx_j1939_can_recv+0x10/0x10 [can_j1939]
can_rcv_filter+0x11f/0x350 [can]
can_receive+0x12f/0x190 [can]
? __pfx_can_rcv+0x10/0x10 [can]
can_rcv+0xdd/0x130 [can]
? __pfx_can_rcv+0x10/0x10 [can]
__netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x13d/0x150
? __pfx___netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x10/0x10
? __kasan_check_write+0x18/0x20
? _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x8c/0xe0
__netif_receive_skb+0x23/0xb0
process_backlog+0x107/0x260
__napi_poll+0x69/0x310
net_rx_action+0x2a1/0x580
? __pfx_net_rx_action+0x10/0x10
? __pfx__raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10
? handle_irq_event+0x7d/0xa0
__do_softirq+0xf3/0x3f8
do_softirq+0x53/0x80
</IRQ>
<TASK>
__local_bh_enable_ip+0x6e/0x70
netif_rx+0x16b/0x180
can_send+0x32b/0x520 [can]
? __pfx_can_send+0x10/0x10 [can]
? __check_object_size+0x299/0x410
raw_sendmsg+0x572/0x6d0 [can_raw]
? __pfx_raw_sendmsg+0x10/0x10 [can_raw]
? apparmor_socket_sendmsg+0x2f/0x40
? __pfx_raw_sendmsg+0x10/0x10 [can_raw]
sock_sendmsg+0xef/0x100
sock_write_iter+0x162/0x220
? __pfx_sock_write_iter+0x10/0x10
? __rtnl_unlock+0x47/0x80
? security_file_permission+0x54/0x320
vfs_write+0x6ba/0x750
? __pfx_vfs_write+0x10/0x10
? __fget_light+0x1ca/0x1f0
? __rcu_read_unlock+0x5b/0x280
ksys_write+0x143/0x170
? __pfx_ksys_write+0x10/0x10
? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20
? fpregs_assert_state_consistent+0x62/0x70
__x64_sys_write+0x47/0x60
do_syscall_64+0x60/0x90
? do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x90
? irqentry_exit+0x3f/0x50
? exc_page_fault+0x79/0xf0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8
Allocated by task 348:
kasan_save_stack+0x2a/0x50
kasan_set_track+0x29/0x40
kasan_save_alloc_info+0x1f/0x30
__kasan_kmalloc+0xb5/0xc0
__kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x67/0x160
j1939_sk_setsockopt+0x284/0x450 [can_j1939]
__sys_setsockopt+0x15c/0x2f0
__x64_sys_setsockopt+0x6b/0x80
do_syscall_64+0x60/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8
Freed by task 349:
kasan_save_stack+0x2a/0x50
kasan_set_track+0x29/0x40
kasan_save_free_info+0x2f/0x50
__kasan_slab_free+0x12e/0x1c0
__kmem_cache_free+0x1b9/0x380
kfree+0x7a/0x120
j1939_sk_setsockopt+0x3b2/0x450 [can_j1939]
__sys_setsockopt+0x15c/0x2f0
__x64_sys_setsockopt+0x6b/0x80
do_syscall_64+0x60/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8
Fixes: 9d71dd0c70099 ("can: add support of SAE J1939 protocol")
Reported-by: Sili Luo <rootlab@xxxxxxxxxx>
Suggested-by: Sili Luo <rootlab@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231020133814.383996-1-o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/can/j1939/j1939-priv.h | 1 +
net/can/j1939/socket.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/can/j1939/j1939-priv.h b/net/can/j1939/j1939-priv.h
index 74f15592d170..31a93cae5111 100644
--- a/net/can/j1939/j1939-priv.h
+++ b/net/can/j1939/j1939-priv.h
@@ -301,6 +301,7 @@ struct j1939_sock {
int ifindex;
struct j1939_addr addr;
+ spinlock_t filters_lock;
struct j1939_filter *filters;
int nfilters;
pgn_t pgn_rx_filter;
diff --git a/net/can/j1939/socket.c b/net/can/j1939/socket.c
index 94cfc2315e54..305dd72c844c 100644
--- a/net/can/j1939/socket.c
+++ b/net/can/j1939/socket.c
@@ -262,12 +262,17 @@ static bool j1939_sk_match_dst(struct j1939_sock *jsk,
static bool j1939_sk_match_filter(struct j1939_sock *jsk,
const struct j1939_sk_buff_cb *skcb)
{
- const struct j1939_filter *f = jsk->filters;
- int nfilter = jsk->nfilters;
+ const struct j1939_filter *f;
+ int nfilter;
+
+ spin_lock_bh(&jsk->filters_lock);
+
+ f = jsk->filters;
+ nfilter = jsk->nfilters;
if (!nfilter)
/* receive all when no filters are assigned */
- return true;
+ goto filter_match_found;
for (; nfilter; ++f, --nfilter) {
if ((skcb->addr.pgn & f->pgn_mask) != f->pgn)
@@ -276,9 +281,15 @@ static bool j1939_sk_match_filter(struct j1939_sock *jsk,
continue;
if ((skcb->addr.src_name & f->name_mask) != f->name)
continue;
- return true;
+ goto filter_match_found;
}
+
+ spin_unlock_bh(&jsk->filters_lock);
return false;
+
+filter_match_found:
+ spin_unlock_bh(&jsk->filters_lock);
+ return true;
}
static bool j1939_sk_recv_match_one(struct j1939_sock *jsk,
@@ -401,6 +412,7 @@ static int j1939_sk_init(struct sock *sk)
atomic_set(&jsk->skb_pending, 0);
spin_lock_init(&jsk->sk_session_queue_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&jsk->sk_session_queue);
+ spin_lock_init(&jsk->filters_lock);
/* j1939_sk_sock_destruct() depends on SOCK_RCU_FREE flag */
sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_RCU_FREE);
@@ -703,9 +715,11 @@ static int j1939_sk_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
}
lock_sock(&jsk->sk);
+ spin_lock_bh(&jsk->filters_lock);
ofilters = jsk->filters;
jsk->filters = filters;
jsk->nfilters = count;
+ spin_unlock_bh(&jsk->filters_lock);
release_sock(&jsk->sk);
kfree(ofilters);
return 0;
--
2.43.0
