Re: [PATCH RESEND v1 0/7] MPFS clock fixes required for correct CAN clock modeling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 06:17:54PM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 08.12.2023 17:12:22, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Resending cos I accidentally only sent the cover letter a few minutes
> > prior to this series, due to screwing up a dry run of sending.
> > :clown_face:
> > 
> > While reviewing a CAN clock driver internally for MPFS [1]
> 
> > 1 - Hopefully that'll show up on the lists soon, once we are happy with
> >   it ourselves.
> 
> A CAN clock driver or a complete CAN driver?

Heh, should have proof read it again in the time afforded to me by the
accident release of the dry run.. It's the latter, sorry.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux