Re: [RESEND PATCH] net: can: Use device_get_match_data()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 11:29 AM Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 03:01:28PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > Use preferred device_get_match_data() instead of of_match_device() to
> > get the driver match data. With this, adjust the includes to explicitly
> > include the correct headers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ...
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c b/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c
> > index abe58f103043..f17fd43d03c0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c
> > @@ -20,8 +20,8 @@
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/netdevice.h>
> >  #include <linux/of.h>
> > -#include <linux/of_device.h>
> >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/property.h>
> >  #include <linux/skbuff.h>
> >  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> >  #include <linux/string.h>
> > @@ -1726,7 +1726,6 @@ static int xcan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >       struct net_device *ndev;
> >       struct xcan_priv *priv;
> >       struct phy *transceiver;
> > -     const struct of_device_id *of_id;
> >       const struct xcan_devtype_data *devtype = &xcan_axi_data;
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> Here devtype is initialised.
>
> >       void __iomem *addr;
> >       int ret;
> > @@ -1741,9 +1740,7 @@ static int xcan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >               goto err;
> >       }
> >
> > -     of_id = of_match_device(xcan_of_match, &pdev->dev);
> > -     if (of_id && of_id->data)
> > -             devtype = of_id->data;
>
> And in the old code devtype was conditionally re-initialised here,
> if a match with data was found.
>
> But in the new code devtype is re-initialised unconditionally.
>
> Possibly I am missing something obvious, but it seems that either this
> should somehow be made conditional, or the initialisation to &xcan_axi_data
> should be dropped.

of_match_device() would never fail because we only match with DT for
this driver and if we didn't match, we wouldn't be in probe. So I'll
drop the initialization.

Rob





[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux