[PATCH 5.10 86/95] can: isotp: isotp_bind(): do not validate unused address information

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



5.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit b76b163f46b661499921a0049982764a6659bfe7 upstream

With commit 2aa39889c463 ("can: isotp: isotp_bind(): return -EINVAL on
incorrect CAN ID formatting") the bind() syscall returns -EINVAL when
the given CAN ID needed to be sanitized. But in the case of an unconfirmed
broadcast mode the rx CAN ID is not needed and may be uninitialized from
the caller - which is ok.

This patch makes sure the result of an inproper CAN ID format is only
provided when the address information is needed.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220517145653.2556-1-socketcan@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/can/isotp.c |   29 +++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

--- a/net/can/isotp.c
+++ b/net/can/isotp.c
@@ -1216,7 +1216,8 @@ static int isotp_bind(struct socket *soc
 	struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
 	int ifindex;
 	struct net_device *dev;
-	canid_t tx_id, rx_id;
+	canid_t tx_id = addr->can_addr.tp.tx_id;
+	canid_t rx_id = addr->can_addr.tp.rx_id;
 	int err = 0;
 	int notify_enetdown = 0;
 
@@ -1226,24 +1227,28 @@ static int isotp_bind(struct socket *soc
 	if (addr->can_family != AF_CAN)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	/* sanitize tx/rx CAN identifiers */
-	tx_id = addr->can_addr.tp.tx_id;
+	/* sanitize tx CAN identifier */
 	if (tx_id & CAN_EFF_FLAG)
 		tx_id &= (CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_EFF_MASK);
 	else
 		tx_id &= CAN_SFF_MASK;
 
-	rx_id = addr->can_addr.tp.rx_id;
-	if (rx_id & CAN_EFF_FLAG)
-		rx_id &= (CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_EFF_MASK);
-	else
-		rx_id &= CAN_SFF_MASK;
-
-	/* give feedback on wrong CAN-ID values */
-	if (tx_id != addr->can_addr.tp.tx_id ||
-	    rx_id != addr->can_addr.tp.rx_id)
+	/* give feedback on wrong CAN-ID value */
+	if (tx_id != addr->can_addr.tp.tx_id)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/* sanitize rx CAN identifier (if needed) */
+	if (isotp_register_rxid(so)) {
+		if (rx_id & CAN_EFF_FLAG)
+			rx_id &= (CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_EFF_MASK);
+		else
+			rx_id &= CAN_SFF_MASK;
+
+		/* give feedback on wrong CAN-ID value */
+		if (rx_id != addr->can_addr.tp.rx_id)
+			return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	if (!addr->can_ifindex)
 		return -ENODEV;
 





[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux