On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 10:48:44AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Sun, 20 Aug 2023 19:08:13 +0300 Ido Schimmel wrote: > > There is another report here [1] with a reproducer [2]. Even with this > > patch, the reproducer can still trigger the warning on net-next. Don't > > we also need to reject a negative ifindex in the ancillary header? At > > least with the following diff the warning does not trigger anymore: > > Yeah, definitely, please go ahead and submit. Sure, will submit tomorrow morning. > Is "ancillary header" used more commonly as a term? in gnel we usually > call this thing "user header" or "fixed header". I honestly don't know. IIRC I saw David using the term a few years ago and decided to adopt it.
