RE: RE: [RESEND] [PATCH 1/1] can: m_can: Control tx and rx flow to avoid communication stall

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Marc,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, July 7, 2023 1:04 PM
> To: Kumari Pallavi <kumari.pallavi@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: rcsekar@xxxxxxxxxxx; Sangannavar, Mallikarjunappa
> <mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@xxxxxxxxx>; Nikula, Jarkko
> <jarkko.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>; linux-can@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Thokala, Srikanth
> <srikanth.thokala@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: RE: [RESEND] [PATCH 1/1] can: m_can: Control tx and rx flow to
> avoid communication stall
> 
> On 07.07.2023 05:38:09, Kumari Pallavi wrote:
> > > >  			if (netif_queue_stopped(dev) &&
> > > >  			    !m_can_tx_fifo_full(cdev))
> > > >  				netif_wake_queue(dev);
> > > > @@ -1787,6 +1787,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t m_can_start_xmit(struct
> > > > sk_buff
> > > *skb,
> > > >  		}
> > > >  	} else {
> > > >  		cdev->tx_skb = skb;
> > > > +		m_can_write(cdev, M_CAN_IE, IR_ALL_INT & (IR_TEFN));
> > >
> > > - What's the purpose of  "()" around IR_TEFN?
> > > - "IR_ALL_INT & (IR_TEFN)" is equal to IR_TEFN, isn't it?
> > > - This basically disables all other interrupts, is this what you want to
> > >   do?
> > > - What happens if the bus is busy with high prio CAN frames and you want
> > >   to send low prio ones? You will not get any RX-IRQ, this doesn't look
> > >   correct to me.
> > >
> >
> > Even though the RX interrupt is disabled (in IE), if there is an TX
> > interrupt and the RF0N bit is set (in IR), the RX packet will still be
> > serviced because the TX and RX share the same IRQ handler.
> 
> If the bus is busy with high prio CAN frames and the m_can wants to send a low
> prio frame, the m_can will not be able to send it's CAN frame, there will be not
> TX interrupt. If there are enough high prio CAN frames the RX buffer will
> overflow.
> 

Sorry for late reply, I agree let me see if I can try to simulate this scenario using CAN
analyzer. I already stressed the current solution for more than 10 days and didn't
observe any issue. However, I will try to incorporate this scenario for stress as well and 
come back.

Thanks,
Pallavi

> regards,
> Marc
> 
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde          |
> Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de |
> Vertretung Nürnberg              | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-9   |




[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux