Re: [PATCH net] can: raw: fix receiver memory leak

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 07.07.23 03:59, Ziyang Xuan (William) wrote:
On 06.07.23 14:48, Ziyang Xuan (William) wrote:

(..)

        }
       out:
        release_sock(sk);
+    rtnl_unlock();

Would it also fix the issue when just adding the rtnl_locks to raw_bind() and raw_release() as suggested by you?

This patch just add rtnl_lock in raw_bind() and raw_release(). raw_setsockopt() has rtnl_lock before this. raw_notify()
is under rtnl_lock. My patch has been tested and solved the issue before send. I don't know if it answered your doubts.

My question was whether adding rtnl_locks to raw_bind() and raw_release() would be enough to fix the issue.

Without introducing the additional ro->dev element!?

Understand. Just add rtnl_lock to raw_bind() and raw_release() can not fix the issue. I tested.

We should understand that unregister a net device is divided into two stages generally.
Fistly, call unregister_netdevice_many() to remove net_dev from device list and add
net_dev to net_todo_list. Secondly, free net_dev in netdev_run_todo().

In my issue. Firstly, unregister_netdevice_many() removed can_dev from device
list and added can_dev to net_todo_list. Then got NULL by dev_get_by_index()
and receivers in dev_rcv_lists would not be freed in raw_release().
After raw_release(), ro->bound would be set 0. When NETDEV_UNREGISTER event
arrived raw_notify(), receivers in dev_rcv_lists would not be freed too
because ro->bound was already 0. Thus receivers in dev_rcv_lists would be leaked.

Thanks for the clarification and the testing!

I really assumed rtnl_lock would do this job and also protect the entire sequence starting with unregister_netdevice_many() !?!

Looking forward to the V2 patch then.

Many thanks,
Oliver


              cpu0                                        cpu1
unregister_netdevice_many(can_dev)
   unlist_netdevice(can_dev) // dev_get_by_index() return NULL after this
   net_set_todo(can_dev)
						raw_release(can_socket)
						  dev = dev_get_by_index(, ro->ifindex); // dev == NULL
						  if (dev) { // receivers in dev_rcv_lists not free because dev is NULL
						    raw_disable_allfilters(, dev, );
						    dev_put(dev);
						  }
						...
						ro->bound = 0;
						...

netdev_wait_allrefs_any()
   call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_UNREGISTER, )
     raw_notify(, NETDEV_UNREGISTER, )
       if (ro->bound) // invalid because ro->bound has been set 0
         raw_disable_allfilters(, dev, ); // receivers in dev_rcv_lists will never be freed


Thanks,
William Xuan


Best regards,
Oliver
.



[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux