On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 11:27 PM Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes > many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by > returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from > emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve > here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first > step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already > returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() is > renamed to .remove(). > > Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove these drivers > callback to the void returning variant. > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds