Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] can: m_can: Optimizations for m_can/tcan part 2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 15.03.2023 12:05:30, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:
> Hi Marc and everyone,
> 
> third version part 2, functionally I had to move from spin_lock to
> spin_lock_irqsave because of an interrupt that was calling start_xmit,
> see attached stack. This is tested on tcan455x but I don't have the
> integrated hardware myself so any testing is appreciated.
> 
> The series implements many small and bigger throughput improvements and
> adds rx/tx coalescing at the end.

I've applied patches 1...5 to can-next.

regards,
Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung Nürnberg              | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129  |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux