Re: [PATCH can-next] can: gw: give feedback on missing CGW_FLAGS_CAN_IIF_TX_OK flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 25.01.2023 06:54:07, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> To send CAN traffic back to the incoming interface a special flag has to
> be set. When creating a routing job for identical interfaces without this
> flag the rule is created but has no effect.
> 
> This patch adds an error return value in the case that the CAN interfaces
> are identical but the CGW_FLAGS_CAN_IIF_TX_OK flag was not set.
> 
> Reported-by: Jannik Hartung <jannik.hartung@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Applied to can-next.

Thanks,
Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux