On 02.02.2023 13:43:07, Oliver Hartkopp wrote: > you asked me to introduce a new variable instead of rolling back the > ro->fd_frames setting in setsockopt. > > I just wondered why you didn't pick the V4 patch then: Doh - that was not intentional! > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/20230131112657.59247-1-socketcan@xxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u > > It has no functional drawback but I was able to add an error return code in > V4. I just wanted to know. Please send a follow up patch against net-next/main once the net/main has been merged in net-next/main. Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
