Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: can: renesas,rcar-canfd: Fix number of channels for R-Car V3U

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/12/2022 10:25, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 10:01 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 02/12/2022 09:22, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> According to the bindings, only two channels are supported.
>>> However, R-Car V3U supports eight, leading to "make dtbs" failures:
>>>
>>>         arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a779a0-falcon.dtb: can@e6660000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('channel2', 'channel3', 'channel4', 'channel5', 'channel6', 'channel7' were unexpected)
>>>
>>> Update the number of channels to 8 on R-Car V3U.
>>> While at it, prevent adding more properties to the channel nodes, as
>>> they must contain no other properties than a status property.
>>>
>>> Fixes: d6254d52d70de530 ("dt-bindings: can: renesas,rcar-canfd: Document r8a779a0 support")
>>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/renesas,rcar-canfd.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/renesas,rcar-canfd.yaml
> 
>>>      description: Maximum frequency of the CANFD clock.
>>>
>>>  patternProperties:
>>> -  "^channel[01]$":
>>> +  "^channel[0-7]$":
>>>      type: object
>>>      description:
>>> -      The controller supports two channels and each is represented as a child
>>> -      node.  Each child node supports the "status" property only, which
>>> +      The controller supports multiple channels and each is represented as a
>>> +      child node.  Each child node supports the "status" property only, which
>>>        is used to enable/disable the respective channel.
>>>
>>> +    unevaluatedProperties: false
>>
>> There are no other properties within a channel, so this should be rather
>> additionalProperties: false.
> 
> Are you sure? Then I also have to add:
> 
>         properties:
>           status: true
> 

Do you? I think it would be first schema needing it, so maybe that would
be a problem for dtschema...

Best regards,
Krzysztof




[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux