+CC: Marc and linux-can mailing list. On Tue. 29 Nov. 2022 at 11:14, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 11:01:51 +0900 Vincent Mailhol wrote: > > As discussed in [1], abbreviating the bootloader to "bl" might not be > > well understood. Instead, a bootloader technically being a firmware, > > name it "fw.bootloader". > > > > Add a new macro to devlink.h to formalize this new info attribute > > name. > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20221128142723.2f826d20@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> > > It's okay for this patch to go via the can tree, FWIW. > It may cause an extra delay for you if you have to wait > for the define to propagate. Marc always pulls from net-next before picking patches and it is a common practice to send to the linux-can mailing list some series which are based on net-next. So I do not foresee any major delay. > Either way you should document the meaning of the parameter, > however obvious it may seem: > > Documentation/networking/devlink/devlink-info.rst ACK. I will send the v2 with both the netdev and the linux-can mailing list. I am fine whoever picks it.
