Re: presume-ack option exact meaning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04.11.2022 10:56:16, Stéphane Grosjean wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> I have searched the net, but I can't find a clear explanation of what
> the "presume-ack" option available in socket-can is.
> 
> Some PEAK-System devices offer an option called "self-ack" which
> allows the controller sending the frame to also send the ACK itself.

Does it actually send an ACK to the bus or ignore the missing ACK?

> Does this behavior correspond to what the "presume-ack" option should
> enable?
> 
> Thank you all for your help and regards,

In

| https://lore.kernel.org/all/1404934273-19233-3-git-send-email-nebaruzdin@xxxxxxxxx

Nikita Edward Baruzdin writes:

| Most CAN controllers have a support for ignoring ACK absence. Some of
| them refer to this feature as a self test mode (e. g. SJA1000) and some
| include it as a part of a loopback mode (e. g. MCP2510).
| 
| Setting the introduced flag via netlink should make CAN controller
| perform a successful transmission, even if there is no acknowledgement
| (dominant ACK bit) received.

Does that answer your question?

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux