Re: CM-ITC, pch_can/c_can_pci, sendto() returning ENOBUFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Marc and Dario,

On 9/16/22 06:14, Jacob Kroon wrote:
...> What I do know is that if I revert commit:

"can: c_can: cache frames to operate as a true FIFO"
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=387da6bc7a826cc6d532b1c0002b7c7513238d5f

then everything looks good. I don't get any BUG messages, and the host has been running overnight without problems, so it seems to have fixed the network interface lockup as well.

I ran the kernel *with* the commit above, and also with the following patch:

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_main.c b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_main.c
index 52671d1ea17d..4375dc70e21f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_main.c
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+#define DEBUG
 /*
  * CAN bus driver for Bosch C_CAN controller
  *
@@ -469,8 +470,15 @@ static netdev_tx_t c_can_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	if (c_can_get_tx_free(tx_ring) == 0)
 		netif_stop_queue(dev);
- if (idx < c_can_get_tx_tail(tx_ring))
+	netdev_dbg(dev, "JAKR:%d:%d:%d:%d\n", idx,
+	                                      c_can_get_tx_head(tx_ring),
+	                                      c_can_get_tx_tail(tx_ring),
+	                                      c_can_get_tx_free(tx_ring));
+
+	if (idx < c_can_get_tx_tail(tx_ring)) {
 		cmd &= ~IF_COMM_TXRQST; /* Cache the message */
+		netdev_dbg(dev, "JAKR:Caching messages\n");
+	}
/* Store the message in the interface so we can call
 	 * can_put_echo_skb(). We must do this before we enable

and I've uploaded the entire log I could capture from /dev/kmsg, right up to the hang, here:

https://pastebin.com/6hvAcPc9

What looks odd to me right from the start is that sometimes when idx rolls over to 0, and *only* when it rolls over to 0, the CAN frame gets cached because "idx < c_can_get_tx_tail(tx_ring)".

Is it possible there is some difference between c_can and d_can in how the HW buffers are working, which breaks the driver on my particular HW setup ?

Regards,
Jacob



[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux