Re: [PATCH 2/2] can: bcm: check the result of can_send() in bcm_can_tx()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sorry, but NACK.

The curr_frame counter handles the sequence counter of multiplex messages.

Even when this single send attempt failed the curr_frame counter has to continue.

For that reason the comment about statistics *before* the curr_frame++ might be misleading.

A potential improvement could be:

	if (!(can_send(skb, 1)))
		op->frames_abs++;

	op->currframe++;

But as op->frames_abs is a functional unused(!) value for tx ops and only displayed via procfs I would NOT tag such improvement as a 'fix' which might then be queued up for stable.

This could be something for the can-next tree ...

Best regards,
Oliver


On 08.09.22 05:04, Ziyang Xuan wrote:
If can_send() fail, it should not update statistics in bcm_can_tx().
Add the result check for can_send() in bcm_can_tx().

Fixes: ffd980f976e7 ("[CAN]: Add broadcast manager (bcm) protocol")
Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  net/can/bcm.c | 3 ++-
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/can/bcm.c b/net/can/bcm.c
index e2783156bfd1..8f5d704a409f 100644
--- a/net/can/bcm.c
+++ b/net/can/bcm.c
@@ -298,7 +298,8 @@ static void bcm_can_tx(struct bcm_op *op)
  	/* send with loopback */
  	skb->dev = dev;
  	can_skb_set_owner(skb, op->sk);
-	can_send(skb, 1);
+	if (can_send(skb, 1))
+		goto out;
/* update statistics */
  	op->currframe++;



[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux