On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 9:06 AM Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Another optimization idea: Do we need to re-read the eflag1? "eflag" is > for error handling only and you're optimizing the good path. I'd argue if a new message entered mailbox 1, this also potentially changed the error state, so we need to read it. Thanks a lot for your feedback! Will post v3 soon. Also I'm sorry for spam in anyones inbox, I didn't get my mailing program to produce plain-text for the last mail. best, Sebastian
