Re: [PATCH v1 00/24] can: add ethtool support and reporting of timestamping capabilities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun. 25 Jul. 2022 at 22:32, Vincent Mailhol
<mailhol.vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This series revolves around ethtool and timestamping. Its ultimate
> goal is that the timestamping implementation within socketCAN meets
> the specification of other network drivers in the kernel. This way,
> tcpdump or other tools derived from libpcap can be used to do
> timestamping on CAN devices.

For those of you who would like to test it, please have a look at the
other series I just sent:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/20220725134345.432367-1-mailhol.vincent@xxxxxxxxxx/T/

@Marc, this is a long series (25 patches but many trivial ones) just
one week before the merge windows. Overall, I have a good confidence
on this series, except for the last four patches:
  can: kvaser_pciefd: advertise timestamping capabilities and add ioctl support
  can: kvaser_usb: advertise timestamping capabilities and add ioctl support
  can: peak_canfd: advertise timestamping capabilities and add ioctl support
  can: peak_usb: advertise timestamping capabilities and add ioctl support

For those last four patches, I would like to get the feedback from
Jimmy and Stéphane before it gets merged. If additional time is needed
for testing, it might be wise to just merge the first 21 patches and
leave those last 4 ones for the next cycle.

Yours sincerely,
Vincent Mailhol



[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux