On Wed, 15 Jun 2022 19:00:10 +0900
Vincent Mailhol <vincent.mailhol@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Max,
>
> Because you will have to send a v9 for the split as requested by Marc,
> let me through a last couple of nitpicks.
Perfect, thanks for your help!
> Some of the function or struct names are still prefixed with elm327,
> some other with can327. Could you harmonize everything and use the
> same prefix throughout the file?
This was from back in the elmcan days, where I named the device
specific things according to the device, and the Linux glue according
to the driver. I agree, elm327/can327 is too similar and confusing now.
Done, thanks!
> > +/* Dummy needed to use bitrate_const */
> > +static int can327_do_set_bittiming(struct net_device *netdev)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> Seems you forgot to remove that guy :)
> c.f.
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkl/linux-can-next.git/commit/?id=7e193a42c37cf40eba8ac5af2d5e8eeb8b9506f9
Oops m(
I've removed it now, thanks.
Max
