Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] can: refactoring of can-dev module and of Kbuild

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07.06.2022 11:49:30, Vincent MAILHOL wrote:
[...]
> So I think that the diagram is correct. Maybe rephrasing the cover
> letter as below would address your concerns?

BTW: I got the OK from Jakub to send PR with merges.

If you think the cover letter needs rephrasing, send a new series and
I'm going to force push that over can-next/master. After that let's
consider can-next/master as fast-forward only.

regards,
Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux