Hi Vincent,
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 08:43:57PM +0900, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
> clang emits a -Wunaligned-access warning on union
> mcp251xfd_tx_ojb_load_buf.
>
> The reason is that field hw_tx_obj (not declared as packed) is being
> packed right after a 16 bits field inside a packed struct:
>
> | union mcp251xfd_tx_obj_load_buf {
> | struct __packed {
> | struct mcp251xfd_buf_cmd cmd;
> | /* ^ 16 bits fields */
> | struct mcp251xfd_hw_tx_obj_raw hw_tx_obj;
> | /* ^ not declared as packed */
> | } nocrc;
> | struct __packed {
> | struct mcp251xfd_buf_cmd_crc cmd;
> | struct mcp251xfd_hw_tx_obj_raw hw_tx_obj;
> | __be16 crc;
> | } crc;
> | } ____cacheline_aligned;
>
> Starting from LLVM 14, having an unpacked struct nested in a packed
> struct triggers a warning. c.f. [1].
>
> This is a false positive because the field is always being accessed
> with the relevant put_unaligned_*() function. Adding __packed to the
> structure declaration silences the warning.
>
> [1] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55520
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Actually, I do not have llvm 14 installed so I am not able to test
> (this check was introduced in v14). But as explained in [1], adding
> __packed should fix the warning.
Thanks for the patch! This does resolve the warning (verified with LLVM
15).
> Because this is a false positive, I did not add a Fixes tag, nor a
> Reported-by: kernel test robot.
I think that the Reported-by tag should always be included but I agree
that a Fixes tag is not necessary for this warning, as we currently have
it under W=1, so it should not be visible under normal circumstances.
> ---
> drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd.h b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd.h
> index 1d43bccc29bf..2b0309fedfac 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd.h
> @@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ struct mcp251xfd_hw_tef_obj {
> /* The tx_obj_raw version is used in spi async, i.e. without
> * regmap. We have to take care of endianness ourselves.
> */
> -struct mcp251xfd_hw_tx_obj_raw {
> +struct __packed mcp251xfd_hw_tx_obj_raw {
> __le32 id;
> __le32 flags;
> u8 data[sizeof_field(struct canfd_frame, data)];
> --
> 2.35.1
>
>
Cheers,
Nathan
