Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] powerpc/52xx: Convert to use fwnode API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 05:05:12PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 11:48:05PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> > > We may convert the GPT driver to use fwnode API for the sake
>> > > of consistency of the used APIs inside the driver.
>> > 
>> > I'm not sure about this one.
>> > 
>> > It's more consistent to use fwnode in this driver, but it's very
>> > inconsistent with the rest of the powerpc code. We have basically no
>> > uses of the fwnode APIs at the moment.
>> 
>> Fair point!
>> 
>> > It seems like a pretty straight-forward conversion, but there could
>> > easily be a bug in there, I don't have any way to test it. Do you?
>> 
>> Nope, only compile testing. The important part of this series is to
>> clean up of_node from GPIO library, so since here it's a user of
>> it I want to do that. This patch is just ad-hoc conversion that I
>> noticed is possible. But there is no any requirement to do so.
>> 
>> Lemme drop this from v3.
>
> I just realize that there is no point to send a v3. You can just apply
> first 3 patches. Or is your comment against entire series?

No, my comment is just about this patch.

I don't mind converting to new APIs when it's blocking some other
cleanup. But given the age of this code I think it's probably better to
just leave the rest of it as-is, unless someone volunteers to test it.

So yeah I'll just take patches 1-3 of this v2 series, no need to resend.

cheers



[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux