On 11.05.2022 14:38:32, Oliver Hartkopp wrote: > I'm a bit unsure why we should not stick with the simple skb->sk > handling? Another use where skb->sk breaks is sending CAN frames with SO_TXTIME with the sched_etf. I have a patched version of cangen that uses SO_TXTIME. It attaches a time to transmit to a CAN frame when sending it. If you send 10 frames, each 100ms after the other and then exit the program, the first CAN frames show up as TX'ed while the others (after closing the socket) show up as RX'ed CAN frames in candump. regards, Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
