At 2022-05-11 16:28:26, "Vincent MAILHOL" <mailhol.vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Wed. 11 May 2022 at 16:11, z <zhaojunkui2008@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> At 2022-05-11 14:44:50, "Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >On 10.05.2022 23:38:38, Bernard Zhao wrote:
>> >> The variable fi and bi only used in branch if (!dev->prev_siblings)
>> >> , fi & bi not kmalloc in else branch, so move kfree into branch
>> >> if (!dev->prev_siblings),this change is to cleanup the code a bit.
>> >
>> >Please move the variable declaration into that scope, too. Adjust the
>> >error handling accordingly.
>>
>> Hi Marc:
>>
>> I am not sure if there is some gap.
>> If we move the variable declaration into that scope, then each error branch has to do the kfree job, like:
>> if (err) {
>> dev_err(dev->netdev->dev.parent,
>> "unable to read %s firmware info (err %d)\n",
>> pcan_usb_pro.name, err);
>> kfree(bi);
>> kfree(fi);
>> kfree(usb_if);
>>
>> return err;
>> }
>> I am not sure if this looks a little less clear?
>> Thanks!
>
>A cleaner way would be to move all the content of the if
>(!dev->prev_siblings) to a new function.
Hi Vincent Mailhol:
Got it.
This seems to be a good idea, i would resubmit one patch V2.
Thanks!
BR//Bernard
>
>Yours sincerely,
>Vincent Mailhol
