Hi Rob, On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 3:34 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 09:32:50PM +0000, Lad Prabhakar wrote: > > Document RZ/V2L CANFD bindings. RZ/V2L CANFD is identical to one found on > > the RZ/G2L SoC. No driver changes are required as generic compatible > > string "renesas,rzg2l-canfd" will be used as a fallback. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > DTSI changes [0] have been posted as part of separate series. > > > > [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/patch/ > > 20220227203744.18355-4-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/renesas,rcar-canfd.yaml | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > The patch wouldn't apply, but I don't see the problem other than the > sha hashes are not from a known base. Please send patches against a > known rcX (rc1 is preferred) unless you have some other dependency. And > document that dependency. > Sorry about that, I missed mentioning the depadancy patch [0]. > Anyways, it is applied manually now. > Thanks. [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/patch/20220209163806.18618-5-uli+renesas@xxxxxxxx/ Cheers, Prabhakar
