Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: can: renesas,rcar-canfd: Document RZ/V2L SoC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Rob,

On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 3:34 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 09:32:50PM +0000, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> > Document RZ/V2L CANFD bindings. RZ/V2L CANFD is identical to one found on
> > the RZ/G2L SoC. No driver changes are required as generic compatible
> > string "renesas,rzg2l-canfd" will be used as a fallback.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > DTSI changes [0] have been posted as part of separate series.
> >
> > [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/patch/
> > 20220227203744.18355-4-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/renesas,rcar-canfd.yaml          | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> The patch wouldn't apply, but I don't see the problem other than the
> sha hashes are not from a known base. Please send patches against a
> known rcX (rc1 is preferred) unless you have some other dependency. And
> document that dependency.
>
Sorry about that, I missed mentioning the depadancy patch [0].

> Anyways, it is applied manually now.
>
Thanks.

[0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/patch/20220209163806.18618-5-uli+renesas@xxxxxxxx/

Cheers,
Prabhakar



[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux