On 09.02.2022 08:40:48, Srinivas Neeli wrote: > Hi Marc, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 9, 2022 2:02 PM > > To: Srinivas Neeli <sneeli@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; kuba@xxxxxxxxxx; Michal > > Simek <michals@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-can@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao > > <appanad@xxxxxxxxxx>; Srinivas Goud <sgoud@xxxxxxxxxx>; git > > <git@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: xilinx_can: Add check for NAPI Poll function > > > > On 09.02.2022 08:29:55, Srinivas Neeli wrote: > > > > On 08.02.2022 21:50:53, Srinivas Neeli wrote: > > > > > Add check for NAPI poll function to avoid enabling interrupts with > > > > > out completing the NAPI call. > > > > > > > > Thanks for the patch. Does this fix a bug? If so, please add a Fixes: > > > > tag that lists the patch that introduced that bug. > > > > > > It is not a bug. I am adding additional safety check( Validating the > > > return value of "napi_complete_done" call). > > > > Thanks for your feedback. Should this go into can or can-next? > > If possible please apply on both branches. That's not an option. Going for can-next as Michal Simek suggested. Adding to linux-can-next/testing. Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
