Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] can: rcar_canfd: Add support for r8a779a0 SoC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Marc,

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 7:43 PM Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 11.01.2022 17:22:28, Ulrich Hecht wrote:
> > Adds support for the CANFD IP variant in the V3U SoC.
> >
> > Differences to controllers in other SoCs are limited to an increase in
> > the number of channels from two to eight, an absence of dedicated
> > registers for "classic" CAN mode, and a number of differences in magic
> > numbers (register offsets and layouts).
> >
> > Inspired by BSP patch by Kazuya Mizuguchi.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ulrich Hecht <uli+renesas@xxxxxxxx>

> > --- a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c

> > -     of_child = of_get_child_by_name(pdev->dev.of_node, "channel1");
> > -     if (of_child && of_device_is_available(of_child))
> > -             channels_mask |= BIT(1);        /* Channel 1 */
> > +     strcpy(name, "channelX");
>
> please use strlcpy()

Why? To cause a silent failure instead of a possible crash, in the unlikely
case the buffer is shrinked or the string is enlarged?

What about preinitializing it at declaration time instead:

    char name[9] = "channelX";

?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds



[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux