Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Improve phandle-array schemas

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19/01/2022 02:50, Rob Herring wrote:
> The 'phandle-array' type is a bit ambiguous. It can be either just an
> array of phandles or an array of phandles plus args. Many schemas for
> phandle-array properties aren't clear in the schema which case applies
> though the description usually describes it.
> 
> The array of phandles case boils down to needing:
> 
> items:
>   maxItems: 1
> 
> The phandle plus args cases should typically take this form:
> 
> items:
>   - items:
>       - description: A phandle
>       - description: 1st arg cell
>       - description: 2nd arg cell
> 
> With this change, some examples need updating so that the bracketing of
> property values matches the schema.
> 

Samsung and memory controller bits look good:

Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>


Best regards,
Krzysztof



[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux