Hi, - the rxerr/txerr counters were used for the first time to determine the new state from: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c11dcee758302702a83c6e85e4c4c3d9af42d2b3 - but their values could be read by the user space according to ctrl_mode, starting from: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ea8b33bde76c8fcef347b9b9cf15649fe41a5a6e Which one do you think is the most appropriate? Regards, Stephane De: Marc Kleine-Budde Envoyé: Vendredi 29 octobre 2021 14:53 À: Stéphane Grosjean Cc: linux-can Mailing List Objet: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] can: peak_usb: always ask for BERR reporting for PCAN-USB devices On 21.10.2021 10:15:04, Stephane Grosjean wrote: > Since for the PCAN-USB, the management of the transition to the > ERROR_WARNING or ERROR_PASSIVE state is done according to the error > counters, these must be requested unconditionally. > > Signed-off-by: Stephane Grosjean <s.grosjean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> This description indicates the patch should be backported, as it fixes a problem. Can you figure out which patch added the problem in the first place, so that we can add a Fixed tag? regards, Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | -- PEAK-System Technik GmbH Sitz der Gesellschaft Darmstadt - HRB 9183 Geschaeftsfuehrung: Alexander Gach / Uwe Wilhelm Unsere Datenschutzerklaerung mit wichtigen Hinweisen zur Behandlung personenbezogener Daten finden Sie unter www.peak-system.com/Datenschutz.483.0.html
