On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:04 PM Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> If register_candev fails, xcan_probe does not clean the napi
> created by netif_napi_add.
>
It seems the netif_napi_del operation is done in the free_candev
(free_netdev precisely).
list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &dev->napi_list, dev_list)
netif_napi_del(p);
And list_add_rcu(&napi->dev_list, &dev->napi_list) is done in the
netif_napi_add.
Therefore, I suggest removing "netif_napi_del" operation in the
xcan_remove to match probe and remove function.
> Fix this by adding error handling code to clean napi when
> register_candev fails.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c b/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c
> index 3b883e607d8b..6ee0b5a8cdfc 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c
> @@ -1807,7 +1807,7 @@ static int xcan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> ret = register_candev(ndev);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "fail to register failed (err=%d)\n", ret);
> - goto err_disableclks;
> + goto err_del_napi;
> }
>
> devm_can_led_init(ndev);
> @@ -1825,6 +1825,8 @@ static int xcan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> return 0;
>
> +err_del_napi:
> + netif_napi_del(&priv->napi);
> err_disableclks:
> pm_runtime_put(priv->dev);
> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> --
> 2.25.1
>
